Thursday, September 28, 2006

The Scoreboard - Part 3

Meanwhile back at the misfit reservation, Chief Loretta Serrano held a powwow signaling to her braves that she was on the warpath with the Court TV Confederacy. Thus a potlatch ritual commenced as members of the defense alliance applied war paint and donned their moccasins in preparation for battle.

I've decided to go down in flames over at CTV. I can reincarnate soon enough. I might as well earn my banning for a change. -Posted by loretta at May 27, 2004 09:35 PM

Boy o boy! I wanted to see what was going on so I clicked on your name on CTV, found the thread, and now I'm reading. GIVE 'EM HELL, Loretta. Kick their (rumproasts)! -Posted by feistyALgal at May 27, 2004 10:02 PM

heh. I can't believe I'm still alive over there. I'm running out of ways to insult Bruce and that wacko, rocks in her head - rockingfarm! -Posted by loretta at May 27, 2004 10:33 PM

I just visited and saw you were swinging your insults w/both fists, Lo. You WILL go down in flames but it's worth it! -Posted by Astrologer at May 27, 2004 10:40 PM

Going down in flames at Court TV...

05-28-2004 @ 02:36 AM - Originally posted by texdude II
Celestrill is one of the most intelligent posters on these boards, so your nastiness is COMPLETELY unjustified.

05-28-2004 @ 03:05 AM - Originally posted by Celestrill U2
Shut up. Stupid hula ho.

05-28-2004 @ 03:13 AM - Originally posted by Celestrill U2
Explain THIS - you impotent limp wee wee.

05-28-2004 @ 03:30 AM - Originally posted by Celestrill U2
Oh take it to your mommy, you crybaby wanker with the comparable teeny tiney itsy bitsy widdle wee wee. This little piggy went wee wee wee wee...

Brave Barbara returns from a reconnaissance mission:

I expect it to get worse over there before it gets better. You can almost sense the desperation in the inmate supporters. It seems to be a mirror of their leader, MG. The comments being made right now are so crazy and outrageous, you can't even really respond to it. -Posted by Barbara at May 28, 2004 08:35 AM

I think it will be fascinating to watch. I wonder if they will keep spinning until they fall off the face of the earth, ah, er board. -Posted by karenancy at May 28, 2004 08:37 AM

You guessed it! I overslept until 9:15, when my phone woke me was my boss! HA! I told him I was running just a tad late! Thank goodness he is a forgiving sort! So, now I am sort of awake, but behinder and behinder at work. This afternoon the boys (that's what I call bob and steve) are going out for an installation, so I'll be able to catch up and get things squared away before the holiday.

I haven't checked PTV to see if I was banned or not. I was so juvenile yesterday, but it was a lot of fun. It's good every once in awhile to let off some steam on those morons, even if it is a bit crass. sue me! -Posted by loretta at May 28, 2004 12:15 PM

I am back as Celestril Deux, and I spelled my nic wrong! Need more sleep! Not that I'll last long, but hey. -Posted by loretta at May 28, 2004 12:48 PM

I see that last night a few sane people over on PTV let that moron, "railsandwind" (the latest incarnation of Modesto Falls/irongates/3rd house/etc.) have it between the eyes about her mumbo jumbo malarky. I missed that, darn it. -Posted by loretta at May 28, 2004 01:33 PM

Whoooah! I got banned already. And I didn't even break any rules! That's the fastest banning on record for me! Ponder had that happen to her every time, too. I might have to change my nic, after all. Dang. Barbara, did you come up with any suggestions? I'd better keep it on the L-D so that none of the little crybabies figures it out right away. -Posted by loretta at May 28, 2004 02:28 PM

heh heh. I am the stealth poster now. Nobody will ever know it's me!! heh heh -Posted by loretta at May 28, 2004 02:44 PM

OMG couldn't hide yourself if you were wearing camoflouge in a jungle!!!! hehehehe! -Posted by Monica at May 28, 2004 04:17 PM

Oh, I could if I really tried, Monica! I have done it for months on the SII "Talk about it" forum. Nitwit and Gnarlene have no idea it's me. Of course, they are pretty stupid, I'll grant you that. Some of the excerebrose in the BS thread won't recognize me, either. Too busy gazing at their navels. -Posted by loretta at May 28, 2004 04:24 PM

Whoa. I have to go! The day goes fast when you come to work at 10 AM!
I'll be bach. I don't know which is worse over at PTV, their laziness, or their stupidity. -Posted by loretta at May 28, 2004 04:49 PM

I am the queen of the subtle insult tonight. Most of 'em don't even realize I'm insulting them. Hey Rose, if you are following the braind dead board, I have had to change my nic to a stealth one! I think you'll figure out who I am rather easily. -Posted by loretta at May 28, 2004 06:49 PM

Lo~ I figured out who you were on your first post! LMAO, you're killing me over there - and you're right, they have NO clue who you are. Keep up the good work, I'm reading! heh -Posted by Rose at May 28, 2004 07:20 PM

Good old MollyJ the snotty little dweller is on board. Despite her protests to the contrary at CTV. HA! It's so easy to expose these lying twits. Why can't they have a little imagination? -Posted by loretta at May 28, 2004 08:06 PM

Freaking losers. -Posted by loretta at May 28, 2004 08:10

I think everybody has their nemesis, but Speidel just irks me to no end! He definitely knows how to bring out the worst in me! And then he acts like we're trying to lock down the thread! Who started it????? -Posted by Barbara at May 28, 2004 09:54 PM

Oh so many places to traipse and gallivant, so little time. -Posted by karenancy at May 28, 2004 09:57 PM

Another day, another complaint!

It never ceases to amaze me how many of the "didn'tdidits" want to accuse the sane and sensible of doing things just to cause trouble and get the AW2B threads closed down, and then they create anonymous nics for the sole reason of coming in to cause trouble on GTV. (If you're reading GTV, you'll see what I'm talking about immediately) -Posted by Barbara at May 29, 2004 09:05 AM

06-21-2004 @03:35 PM - Originally posted by LoisLane
Is Celestrill around any more? She/he claimed to have inside sources?

Yes ... Her new name is Dora Explora (SP)



Monday, September 25, 2006

The Scoreboard - Part 2

One month after the scuffle with members of Detective Talk, Loretta Serrano set her sights on another message board, namely, Court TV. Witnesses say that she would often be logged onto Court TV after announcing plans of spending the day at the pool or library with her children. Eventually other misfits enthusiastically joined Loretta in her forays referring to their simultaneous sojourns between CTV and TAI as "camping expeditions".

Court TV Highlights:

08-23-2003 @ 02:25 AM - Originally posted by Celestrill
Hey Blue, please empty your PM box. Thanks!

01-20-2004 @ 02:05 AM - Originally posted by Celestrill
People, People, People. Have I ever misled you.... JohnT.... I am not coming back to this thread! You and Checkers are on your own.

02-05-2004 @ 04:29 AM - Originally posted by Celestrill
Some simply cannot type. Or spell.

03-01-2004 @ 12:04 AM - Originally posted by Celestrill II
Would you care to support that allegation with some proof? This is scurillous [sic] and usubstantiated [sic]. If you never go there, how would you know?

03-01-2004 @ 02:17 AM - Originally posted by designer5
Celestrill says she's writing a book about the Laci Peterson case when it is over.

03-03-2004 @ 02:02 AM - Originally posted by Celestrill II
Perhaps you should look up the spelling, for a start: HYPOCRITE. And I think it was I who said unfriendly things about you.

03-03-2004 @ 04:05 AM - Originally posted by Unknown poster
Questinator - 3/3/04 @ 04:03 AM This person is on your Ignore List.
DingEBrat - 3/3/04 @ 04:04 AM This person is on your Ignore List.
Celestrill II - 3/3/04 @ 04:04 AM This person is on your Ignore List.

03-05-2004 @ 03:52 AM – Originally posted by Unknown poster
DingEBrat - 3/5/04 @ 03:45 AM This person is on your Ignore List.
Celestrill II - 3/5/04 @ 03:45 AM This person is on your Ignore List.

03-06-2004 @ 12:36 AM - Originally posted by Celestrill II
If somebody makes a spelling or grammatical mistake in a post and you quote them, you place [sic] after the misspelled word (or misused word, or...

03-08-2004 @ 05:35 PM - Originally posted by Celestrill Two
read your post, and many of your previous posts where you justify everything he does. I don't have any use for justifying indefensible behavior.

03-09-2004 @ 04:39 AM - Originally posted by Celestrill Two
And I am such a boring and terrible writer I have had so far a Total of 289,156 visitors since the blog opened...

03-18-2004 @ 05:53 PM - Originally posted by Celestrill Two
No, I think this discussion is about to be severely censored, as it was on WebSleuths when I discussed it over there.

03-22-2004 @06:59 PM - Originally posted by VictorianRose
Celestrill Two: I've lived in both the Modesto area and now the Bay area, and you have done neither. What in the world are you talking about,

03-30-2004 @ 03:01 AM - Originally posted by Celestrill Two
No, I never said I sold boats. Link, please? Selective and faulty memories are a sign of dementia. Perhaps some ginko biloba will do the trick....

04-03-2004 @ 07:13 PM - Originally posted by Celestrill Too
The difference is, I'm not anonymous. I publish what I know, what I hear, for all the world to see. I am not hiding behind a nickname or handle...

04-05-2004 @ 05:42 PM - Originally posted by Celestrill Too
I'd rather be a narcissist than an idiot. As it is, I am neither.

04-08-2004 @ 08:19 AM - Originally posted by Celestrill 2
It's not normal around here. It's SISSY. I expect Geragos to be raising a sissy. What else could he raise?

04-08-2004 @ 02:15 PM - Originally posted by Celestrill 2
When you are 80 proof like you are most nights, Tara, I don't pay much attention to you. Sober up. Maybe then you'll be a better mother and...

04-08-2004 @ 02:52 PM - Originally posted by factsonly
Me neither, I find Celestrill two or 2 or whatever disgusting along with those who defended her last night.

04-10-2004 @ 04:49 AM - Originally posted by Unknown poster
If this keeps up, we're going to have to re-name this thread. "All About Celestrill"

04-12-2004 @ 05:59 AM - Originally posted by Angelicmessages
Celestrill do you ever post anything relevant to this case? So far all you do is bitch

04-12-2004 @ 06:34 AM - Originally posted by Celestrill 2
Have you ever heard of a comma?

04-18-2004 @ 05:22 AM - Originally posted by Celestrill 2
your - possessive (your poor grammar)
their - possessive (their poor grammar)

04-18-2004 @ 05:32 AM - Originally posted by Celestrill 2
care less - two words meaning caring about something less
careless - one word meaning sloppy

04-18-2004 @ 05:36 AM - Originally posted by Celestrill 2
Dreamed, not dreamt. Affectation, perhaps?

04-18-2004 @ 06:45 AM - Originally posted by Celestrill 2
Might I remind you this is America and we are in the 21st century. Archaic and affected grammar are generally utilized by the pathologically insecure.

04-18-2004 @ 06:47 AM - Originally posted by Celestrill 2
Typos are forgivable. Consistently bad grammar and atrocious spelling are signs of stupidity.

04-24-2004 @ 04:26 AM - Originally posted by Celestrill 2
I have had sneezes last longer than my posts on this thread.

04-25-2004 @ 05:29 PM - Originally posted by Celestrill 2
I think he is not only INCOMPETENT, but he is also EVIL. Geragos has his own agenda, and it has nothing to do with a vigorous defense for his...

04-28-2004 @ 06:49 AM - Originally posted by Celestrill 2
Molly is a ghoul. That means she cannot die a slow death. She is already dead. Metaphorically speaking, of course.

04-28-2004 @ 07:12 AM - Originally posted by Celestrill 2
M. K., like "treetime" and a few others are just ex-mifits with an axe to grind. I probably banned her last year and she is still smarting.

04-30-2004 @ 04:14 PM - Originally posted by Celestrill 2X
According to neighbors who e-mailed me last January, the house smelled like bleach.

05-01-2004 @ 09:25 AM - originally posted by PALEandWAN
I see the Siamese twin trolls, Morrigan and Celestrill, are here again so I will take my leave. What bores they are.

05-01-2004 @ 02:55 PM - Originally posted by Celestrill 2X
Yeah, right. That wingnut Muna is sending the letters! I heard he is dying, anyway. Might as well go out with a bang.

05-11-2004 @10:17 PM - Originally posted by Celestrill 2U
Well, let's see now, how many nics have you had? Should we really GO THERE??? I think not!
Celestrill-> Celestrill II-> Celestrill Two-> Celestrill Too->
Celestrill 2-> Celestrill 2x-> Celestrill 2U -> Celestrill U2
One thread!


Tuesday, September 19, 2006

The Scoreboard - Part 1

According to "who is" was created on January 16, 2003. Within three months Loretta Serrano and her misfit posters were immersed in a bitter conflict with members of "Detective Talk". An interesting aspect of the feud is that Loretta Serrano objected to having her personal information posted publicly!

This is my final request. Remove the e-mail information of my readers. Remove the string that includes my personal information. Remove the pictures and the articles I wrote that are posted on this site without permission. Consider this my formal request. 403 can trace my IP. He knows this is me. Loretta

You all are now witnesses to my formal request for this information to be removed. They have violated copyright, and are considered stalkers by the law. If this information does not get removed promptly, I can press formal charges. Thank you, and let's just let this matter go, for now. I have consulted with the authorities and I will let them handle if from there. So, let's change the subject. -Posted by Loretta at April 1, 2003 12:48 PM

From: loretta s

Dear Sir: Please consider this my formal request for the removal of forum topics that include personal information about me that is considered harassment: my DL information, my pictures, and any copyrighted violations of my images, articles, and comments. The domain information is public domain, and I am not concerned about that. I have been advised to request your cooperation in this matter. I appreciate your prompt response. -Thank you, Loretta at

I have now done my legal obligation to ask them to voluntarily cease and desist and to remove the offending material. They have 24 hours. -Posted by Loretta at April 1, 2003 01:12 PM

I consider this a very good learning experience. I have learned a lot from LE and what is and is not legal on the internet these past few days! By the way, using someone else's e-mail address to subscribe to newletters, pornographic sites, or other unsolicited material is also illegal. -Posted by Loretta at April 1, 2003 01:16 PM

It's really unbelievable that a DL # would be posted. That IS identity theft. A police report should be made ASAP. ann -Posted by dingbat at April 1, 2003 01:51 PM

Note: Identity theft occurs when somebody steals your name and other personal information for fraudulent purposes. Identity theft is a form of identity crime (where somebody uses a false identity to commit a crime).

Whooo Hooo!!! We found the host!!! I have contacted them and they gave me all the information I need to report the abuse, and they are going to handle it on their end as well. -Posted by Loretta at April 1, 2003 01:59 PM

The IP address is: 6x.2xx.2x.4x That is the IP to which you refer when reporting abuse. -Posted by Loretta at April 1, 2003 02:28 PM

I am still browsing the DT site. I did read where 'elusive' posted to Loreta that she WOULD remove all emails if Loretta would remove the posts made on misfittting about her (elusive). seemed reasonable enough to me as an outside observer. I did notice Loretta does have posts on here about 'elusive'. Loretta? seems to me the ball is in your court now. 'elusive' didn't have anything else 'personal' on there about you or any members here that I could find.

In all fairness to both sides and in trying to stay neutral here, I did see several posts from Loretta on that site that were directed towards 'elusive' that were name calling. Especially one post particular post to 'elusive' that had a list of names Loretta called her. and 'elusve', at least to me, seems to be willing to remove anything Loretta finds threatning or personal. jmho (just commenting about my personal observations) -Posted by a friend at April 1, 2003 02:32 PM

Elusive is not the problem. The problem is the copyright violations: sunflower, puhleease, greekgirl, ocean; the problem is the DL information: sunflower. The problem is the picture: sunflower. I don't think elusive is doing anything but piling on. And there is nothing I have posted on here about her, except the "HEADS UP" I got from the moderator at "Wethinkscottpetersondidit" at the Yahoo forum. That's it. -Posted by Loretta at April 1, 2003 02:43 PM

Friend- We may have stooped to their level at times, and I am embarrassed to admit that I have done it, but not on their site. We didn't post DL#s or addresses or phone #s. I have seen EB call her "whoretta" and "lowretta," if you want specific examples of name calling. -Posted by lex at April 1, 2003 02:45 PM

Ok, maybe I missed it but I thought her email was on here too, unless it was taken down by now. was only trying to remain neutral and maybe help mend this as an outside observer. there was a post by elusve asking you to remove the yahoo comments and email address. That was what I saw and didnt know if you read that yet. she said she would remove the emails but wanted her info off here to. all I was saying was that seemed reasonalbe to me. -Posted by a friend at April 1, 2003 02:48 PM

I think the yahoo info can be posted here, since it IS a warning to others about her past behavior. I am the one that posted her e-mail, only after she posted all of ours. I asked Loretta to remove it once my head cleared. I was mad, and I think I had a right to be. I was merely giving people the same access to her, that she had given others to us. -Posted by lex at April 1, 2003 02:52 PM

I was just saying the 'eb' did not do the lisence number or personal information posts. she did get in a word war with loreta but was just saying that it sounded reasonable to ask that the yahoo comments be removed and she was saying she was willing to remove comments or emails there to. I dont know that sunflower would do that. I just thought it was an offer that was reasonalbe. -Posted by a friend at April 1, 2003 02:55 PM

I agree about the lisence number. that was not right. i did read that the administrater saw a lot of the same ip numbers for the new members that posed as misfits. it wasn't right but at least if it was me i would bend to make peace and then focus on the illegal stuff and the yahoo was heresay and not illegal to ask loreta to take it down on here. -Posted by a friend at April 1, 2003 03:00 PM

Elusive welched on her deal. I removed all the e-mails from this site, after she asked me to and agreed to remove the e-mails of the readers of this site from DT. She didn't do it. Why should I believe any of their demands, now? The only way they will be satisfied is if you all leave, and I take down the site. I will not negotiate with terrorists. -Posted by Loretta at April 1, 2003 03:42 PM

i just read your post loreta and mabey i am wrong but you said you would not remove her yahoo comment and that was part of her request. -Posted by a friend at April 1, 2003 03:45 PM

I removed the post from yesterday's comment string regarding EB's involvement in Yahoo. Now, watch to see if they remove the e-mails and other derogatory stuff. Don't hold your breath. -Posted by Loretta at April 1, 2003 03:56 PM

wow just took forever to find this but i did. i saw a post that i think was the one 'eb' referred to and wanted removed but it was still here loreta (dont be mad i am just trying to help you here) and if i can find it so can the people from the other site to. maybe if you delete that it would fix things.

i wont re post it here so you wont have more work to do by deleting my post to but i did post the date and time so you can find it easyer (yahoo message about 'eb' Posted by Loretta at March 31, 2003 09:51 PM ) hope that helps you so you dont have to search for it. -Posted by a friend at April 1, 2003 04:07 PM

I was trying to help both sides and stayed nuetral and still am. good luck with everything lorreta and i dont personally think your picture is bad at all and you dont look old either so just try to ignore mean comments like that if you can. -Posted by a friend at April 1, 2003 04:36 PM

I received this e-mail from Robert Cortez, administrator of Detective Talk, regarding my request to remove the offensive material:

I will do as you wish if: You publicly appologize (on my board and yours) for callimg my users and I "terrorists". You publicly applogize (on my board and yours) for following your ex-users to my board and then harrasing them for leaving your board. You point out which items on my board you have a problem with.

I wrote him back, offering to apologize to any of my former posters if I offended them, but not to apologize to any of his forum who abused us or terrorized us. I told him to delete most of the General Discussion Forum. When I went in to apologize on his site to my former posters, I found that I was banned from the site. So, how can I apologize publicly on his site, if I can't get in?Interesting. -Posted by Loretta at April 1, 2003 06:52 PM

The administrator at DT (Mr. Cortez) just e-mailed me to inform me that he did not ban me. In fact, his site has been hacked. I would like to publicly thank Mr. Cortez for removing the offensive material prior to the hacking. I was only aware of it through reader e-mail, and never had a chance to see it for myself. I don't know if this argument caused this, or if anyone here could hack their way out of a pocket calculator (which I told him I certainly couldn't) but I apologize to everyone on that site that used to post here if you were offended by any of my postings on that site. What I say in my own livingroom I will not defend. I am not happy that this happened. -Posted by Loretta at April 1, 2003 07:06 PM

Well, I'm glad to see I'm one of your main topics of discussion this evening. I find it hilarious to read some of the speculation about me. It's funny to see things written about me that are flat out not true. I especially like the post on this site, talking about how I'm unreasonable, and probably wouldn't remove a post, and agree to a truce, etc... It's odd that you can all say this, but NOT A SINGLE one of you sent me a message asking me to remove anything, not even you Loretta. If you REALLY wanted it removed, why didn't you just ask? I'm not an unreasonable person by any means. However, I don't appreciate the behavior that you and your members were engaging in on our site, just as I'm sure you didn't appreciate ours either.

This all started over a simple post by one of our members, who in turn immediately set the record straight with you. But, for some reason, we continued to have harrassment on our site over it. You yourself continued to come back as well, posting snide comments. How did you ever expect anything to stop, if you wouldn't quit coming over there stirring up trouble? There are plenty of people who can attest to this, including several of your own members.

And everyone wants to go on and on about posting so-called personal information. Anything posted on that site was public information, obtained by a simple search online. I'm definitely no computer expert, yet I was able to obtain a lot of information by a few simple searches that any Joe Blow off the street could also do. No information I had was priveleged in any way. There are a ton of public information sites on the web, accessible to anyone. I guess if you all have such a problem with it, you should contact your lawmakers to keep information like that off the internet, and not complain about me getting it. You have the exact same opportunities as I do, simply by the fact you are on the internet.

I would also like to add that our members were not the first ones in posting so-called personal information. Loretta took it upon herself to post the registration for DT for all to see, which included the website administrators name, phone, address, etc... Why is it OK for you to do this, but when it is done back to you, you get upset about it? I'm not trying to be rude, just merely an observation.

It seems obvious that our site was hacked by someone associated with this site. I mean, there was a reward posted by this site in obtaining DT information! If that's not a confession, I don't know what is. If you were truly turning it over to the authorities, then why were you soliciting this information? Wouldn't that be a job for the "authorities?"

As I stated before... if anyone had a problem with me, I was available every day to receive messages, but not a single one of you sent me a thing. But now... you're all on here talking about how difficult I am, etc... I think it's quite a double standard that you people did to us what was done to you, but now you all want to cry uncle!

I'm not posting this message as harrassment, this is truly my opinion, and it shouldn't be deleted. But, if it's deleted... it just goes to show the narrow mindedness that has been expressed plenty of times before. That's my two cents worth, take it how you like.

-Posted by SUNFLWER at April 2, 2003 01:49 AM


Friday, September 08, 2006

Loretta Serrano, Super Sleuth (2)

"Not to mention the fact that if this abductor was THAT GOOD, I assure you that he would have done this before and there would be other, unsolved, mysterious disappearances of little girls or boys. You must disregard your emotional reactions. You must put on your pointy little thinking caps and detach from your erroneous "feelings." Look at all the evidence. Listen to that 911 call. Read what Lunsford says (don't watch him - he has a way of distracting you). There are so many things wrong with this picture, including them CASHING IN on this tragedy, I don't know what more you need to think that HE STINKS TO HIGH HEAVEN!" -Posted by loretta at March 1, 2005 10:42 AM

"In fact, the next person who suggests that someone from the church or someone from the neighborhood, or one of the 50 sex offenders in the however many square mile area or the milkman came in and took Jessie, you better bring me some evidence." -Posted by loretta at March 1, 2005 10:46 AM

"The more I see Whoseyerdaddy, the more he gives me the creeps. I think if he gets away with this and makes thousands of dollars, it will be considered an ingenious plan. I'm taking this one step further. I'm suggesting he planned it and that it was financially motivated." -Posted by loretta at March 1, 2005 10:53 AM

"That crossed my mind as well Loretta, as horrible as it is to imagine." -Posted by karenancy at March 1, 2005 10:54 AM

"I'm going to lay it all out for you in black and white and you can decide where this investigation should go from here. I think it will be fairly obvious. Follow the money, follow the dad." -Posted by loretta at March 1, 2005 11:27 AM

"Long, long ago in a far and distant past life, I stayed out late and partied with friends. Often someone would go for a "run" in the middle of the night, like say 2 or 3 AM. Quite common. Who's to say Mark didn't go for a little "run" that night (or that was his excuse) and really go home and take Jessica?" -Posted by loretta at March 2, 2005 07:28 PM

"Regardless of whether or not Mark did something or someone else did something or, in the unilikely event it was a predatory stranger, Mark's lifestyle has contributed to his daughter's disapearance. Notice that this is a common thread. Lunsford had a habit of going out all night. Carlie Bruscia's mother is a junkie. The Smarts let homeless men work in their house. The Van Dams were vulnerable because of their lifestyle choices. Unattended children are taken every day. -Posted by loretta at March 3, 2005 10:55 AM

I don't believe anyone sized up the situation more accurately than the following from Court TV's forum 03-18-2995 11:34 PM:

"The owner of the misfitting blog was particularly nasty in some of her comments against the father. I hope they come back to bite her in her sorry a$$."

Response: "Loretta? I'm not surprised..."


A "bite in her sorry a$$" courtesy of Mark Lunsford.

Labels: , ,

Loretta Serrano, Super Sleuth (1)

"Just a little aside, here. I know some of you think I'm a little strange, and some of you know that I have made some bad judgments in my life, and some of you even think I am a conceited snob, but let me tell you something about this case. I was right.

I was so goldarn right about every single aspect of it, what I saw in my heart, what I imagined, how I read Scott Peterson like a book. It's vindication for me. I joke that RD read the blog, but the truth is that all the things I have been saying here for two years have been absolutely true.

It was the first time in my life that I was SO RIGHT about something. It was almost like a divine psychic phenomenon. I give God all the credit. I don't know why He gave me this vision or this consistent, day after day comprehension of this, because it has never happened before and may never happen again. But it happened with this case.

That should give you a good reason to believe that the outcome will be as I have predicted all along too. I am absolutely 100% confident of a conviction, and a spiritual awakening for millions of people because of this case." -Posted by loretta at November 2, 2004 08:59 PM

Riding high on the sweet smell of success that lingered in the misfit air in February of 2005, Loretta Serrano, super sleuth, formulated a few critical predictions regarding the Jessica Lunsford case.

'This is not a whodunit game, this is a find Jessica crusade.'
"This is bogus. These people are whack jobs. That message board is a way to find theories that lead AWAY from the family. This is NOT a search for the truth. I condemn this effort and its perpetrators for obstructing justice. My two-cents. I'm sure they don't care for my editorial, either.
Hey, I'm just going by the evidence and the statistics, people. Show me a scinilla of evidence that points to a stranger or even a "friend" abducting that child? When you do, I'll revise my stance." -Posted by loretta
at February 28, 2005 08:18 PM

"This was an inside job. There is no doubt about that. I don't know if Mark is responsible for any of it, but someone in that house IS." -Posted by loretta at February 28, 2005 10:30 PM

"Not that we don't have plenty of Northern Ohio trash up here, mind you. I am convinced that half the country is comprised of white trash." -Posted by loretta at February 28, 2005 09:21 PM

"Seriously, let's take a look at the cases we have been following for the last two years and notice the alarming majority of parents or perps are WT: Carlie Bruscia's mom (her dad was AWOL in another state) Kelly Bullwinkle's mom (her dad was AWOL in another state) Jackie Peterson, The Barbees, Dodd, Jessica's parents, Michael Jackson's accuser and his family, Gary Ridgeway (Green River Killer) And, in my opinion, Danielle Van Dam's mother." -Posted by loretta at February 28, 2005 09:34 PM

"I don't know why y'all are getting paranoid and scared here and locking your doors. You've got more to worry about with the BOOGY MAN inside your homes than outside them." -Posted by loretta at March 1, 2005 10:11 AM

"I really don't think my 14-year-old son is snatchable, and anyone who managed it would probably be paying me to take him back, a la "The Ransom of Red Chief." And the boogey man doesn't live at my house. If Husband decided he couldn't live with me any more, he would simply tell me to get out. I've just got the heebie-jeebies." -Posted by vero [of Ronni’s Rants] at March 1, 2005 10:28 AM

"If you rule out dad and grandpa, who do you have left? You can't rule them out. I don't care how feeble he looks or if Lunsford says the right thing or cries on cue. You cannot rule them out. What do we have here, a kidnapper with an invisbility cloak and a magic carpet? People, people, people. Get real." -Posted by loretta at March 1, 2005 10:39 AM

Labels: , ,

Friday, September 01, 2006

Back Again?

Cyber Stalker, Anne from Brazil

Host Name:
IP Address:
Country: Brazil
City: São Paulo
ISP: Comite Gestor Da
Internet No Brasil
Returning Visits: 6

Length: Multiple spread over more than one day

System Specs:
MSIE 6.0
Windows XP

Navigation Path:

30th August 2006 - 09:10:50 PM
No referring link

1st September 2006 - 09:39:55 AM
No referring link

3rd September 2006 - 09:09:03 AM

4th September 2006 - 10:00:41 AM
No referring link

6th September 2006 - 10:14:34 AM
No referring link

Host Name:
IP Address:
Country: Brazil
City: São Paulo
ISP: Comite Gestor Da Internet No Brasil
Returning Visits: 0
Visit Length: 2 mins 51 secs

System Specs:
MSIE 6.0
Windows 98

Navigation Path:

2nd September 2006 - 12:13:30 PM

2nd September 2006 - 12:14:50 PM

2nd September 2006 - 12:16:21 PM

Host Name:
IP Address:
Country: Brazil
City: São Paulo
ISP: Comite Gestor Da Internet No Brasil
Returning Visits: 10

System Specs:
MSIE 6.0
Windows XP

Navigation Path:

6th September 2006 - 10:14:34 AM
No referring link

7th September - 2006 07:13:43 PM
No referring link

8th September - 2006 05:31:33 PM

11th September 2006 - 02:34:01 PM

Host Name:
IP Address:
Country: Brazil
City: São Paulo
ISP: Comite Gestor Da Internet No Brasil
Returning Visits: 0

System Specs:
MSIE 6.0
Windows XP

Navigation Path:

6th September 2006 - 02:44:07 PM
-32%2CWZPA%3Aen&q=%22anne curi%22 brazil&btnG=Pesquisar&lr=

6th September 2006 - 02:45:00 PM
-32%2CWZPA%3Aen&q=%22anne curi%22 brazil&btnG=Pesquisar&lr=

Host Name:
IP Address:
Country: Brazil
City: São Paulo
ISP: Comite Gestor DaInternet No Brasil
Returning Visits: 3
Length: 21 hours 21 mins 32 secs

System Specs:
MSIE 6.0
Windows XP

Navigation Path:

27th September 2006 - 06:42:39 PM

28th September 2006 - 09:50:05 PM
No referring link

28th September 2006 - 09:50:13 PM

28th September 2006 - 09:54:27 PM
No referring link

3rd October 2006 - 11:29:09 PM

5th October 2006 - 05:05:44 PM
No referring link

6th October 2006 - 04:05:04 PM

7th October 2006 - 11:00:35 AM
No referring link

9th October 2006 - 11:09:37 AM

10th October 2006 - 08:31:09 AM
No referring link
Just checking in to say that I've received the e-mail Loretta sent me, requesting to shut down some of the Tribute Blogs.

I will consider it, but I want to read/understand it first.

I haven't "ketchuped" yet. Today was a Holiday for me (Yom Kippur) and I am just back from the Synagogue /Family's dinner.

I will read tomorrow and state my opinion.


Anne |10.02.06 - 9:08 pm | # - IP:
São Paulo, Brazil
Larger in size and population than New York City, its broad avenues and cement skyscrapers sprawl out under a grayish-blue blanket of smog. Only a few scattered patches of greenery break up the unbounded urban blight. Greater São Paulo is home to nearly 20 million people, making it the planet's fourth largest megalopolis. The city's east/west axis spans a full 80 kilometers and true to warnings found in both business and tourist brochures, the region is an incubator for pollution, crime, and poverty.

The statistics are equally shocking. On any given day there are 2,000 assaults and 25 murders in the greater metropolitan area. During that same period of time, four million cars spew 7,000 tons of toxins into the city's air and 1,000 tons of raw sewage are dumped into its main river. There are only 4.6 meters of vegetation per inhabitant - three times less than that recommended by the United Nations.

And the economic outlook is also bleak. More than half the families in São Paulo survive on less than US$150 per month and live in either substandard housing or outright slums. These aspects of Brazil's financial heart are well documented and, because of them, visiting the city either on business or pleasure shouldn't be taken lightly.