Clueless in Cleveland

Hear Ye! Hear Ye! The Usenet Court of Appeal is now in session.
Honorable Henri Papillon presiding.

The City of Mentor, Appellee vs. Loretta D. Smith, Appellant

Criminal: Section #2903-13
Assault: 1st Degree Misdemeanor

Appellant: Loretta Smith Slugger Serrano a.k.a. RetzQ

RetzQ - Mon, Jul 24 2006 10:08 pm
Very old news. And I already wrote a long entry about it on my blog a couple of YEARS ago, so it's not even newsworthy. It's just another thing I've already admitted to long ago and don't have any concern about it, otherwise why would I have posted a story about it on the WWW? Hello, get the clue phone. And as far as having my accounts closed, I had 300 times more money in 1999 in that document than Cxx Bxxxx had in 2000 when he murdered his daughter, and I wasn't even married to an engineer who makes "big bucks."

Respondent: You posted a story about it on the WWW as part of the modification process during the futile reconstruction of your ineffectual, worthless life. Your counterfeit version didn't even resemble what court documents authenticate. Read: It was riddled with errors and omissions.


RetzQ - Mon, Jul 24 2006 10:21 pm
Correction: 30 times. Put one too many zeros after that. In retrospect, I probably should have let that case go to trial, because I had a very good chance of acquittal since the "victim" was lying through her teeth and had a history of crying wolf, frivolous litigation, harassment, mental illness and other sterling character references. However, it would have meant a lot of time off from work, and the $350 was chump change to just put the entire absurdity behind me.

Respondent: You blew off the perfect opportunity to assassinate someone's character for chump change? Get outta here! You expect me to believe you deprived yourself of a chance to convince a jury you were innocent because you didn't want to miss a day of work? With the explosives you had stored in your arsenal? Are you pulling my leg? You should be kicking yourself! Geez, you could have given birth to your first blook eight years ago, fool! Ah, the complexities of life! If only we knew then what we know now, hmmm?


RetzQ - Tues, Jul 25 2006 9:29 am
This is false. I did not know the cow was with calf. I pled "nolo contedere" to a set of false and exaggerated allegations that I disputed. The fact is, since the alleged 'assault' took place on her turf, I was at a distinct disadvantage. Her story is mostly false, I never entered the home, she was not injuried in any major way, I did not punch her, and she failed to include the part where she slammed the door on my body, pulled my hair, and pummelled me with her fists as I leaned in to call my 2-yr old child. Incidentally, I waited in the driveway 20 minutes for the police to arrive that she claimed to have called. She obviously did not call them until I gave up and left. At that point, I went to the police station and reported that I could not retrieve my child from my ex-b/f home, and they told me that they do not enforce custody and visitation orders and that I'd have to go to a judge. Conveniently Ms DiWarpo failed to obtain all the documents regarding this goofy case.

Nebber mind that the incident took place almost 8 years ago, was adjudicated and closed and is now actually expunged. DiStupid is the only one with any record of it. There was never any probation. Does she name any probation officer? Did DiSilly offer any proof of that silly nonsense? No. I thought not.

And, for all it was worth, it was a minor event. Think about it. How banal. How utterly banal. I couldn't care less if you all posted the documents on the front page of the New York Times. I assure you that Nobody cares. I told the story long ago to everyone, and it's just not interesting to anyone but a few mutts who will find fault with a hangnail.

So, here's a quarter - call someone who cares.

Respondent: So, you didn't know "the cow was with calf"? Did you happen to know if the cow had Hemophilia? How about Epilepsy? Was she on Anticoagulant medication? Did you have any knowledge of her medical history? What you DID know is that there were two children in the house, didn't you? But that didn't stop you either.

I doubt there's a person left on the Internet, excepting monktards, that believes you waited 20 minutes for the police to come. Particularly since you had a history of doing things your way, as opposed to theirs, according to documentation. Sooo, the Avon Lake Police escorted L's dad to your residence in order for you to comply with the visitation order, but the Mentor Police wouldn't help you out? Police Departments have different policies? How would they enforce a visitation order that you were violating? Now, that IS goofy!

Well, Miss Marple, I'm at a loss to understand how you accumulate so much information on the relatives of your detractors, yet failed to run across your own criminal conviction. I guess you've never run a check on anyone from Ohio? That oversight isn't very flattering to a famous crime author such as yourself. Of course you'd be able to produce a copy of the notice had it been expunged.

Criminal case number CRB 9900019: http://tinyurl.com/mpys9

Docket Entry: http://tinyurl.com/qsmoh

I don't agree with your "minor event" assessment whatsoever. My previous entry talks about how assault is considered a violent crime and for very good reasons. Just ask Thomas Junta!

http://tinyurl.com/m8yg6

He's the hockey dad who used his fist when he didn't get his way. Like you, he couldn't control his anger. It didn't matter that kids witnessed the confrontation to him either. One of those kids doesn't have a dad anymore. I don't think Mr. Junta considers it a "minor event".

Apparently you share the same philosophy as Mr. Junta, Loretta:

Quote:

December 15, 2004 - Meanwhile, there's another problem with Kxxx and Cxxxxxxxxxx (mostly Cxxxxxxxxxx) and I had to address that this morning. K&C's father came in to drop off their 1-yr old and I contronted him about the problem. He wouldn't even LOOK at me. Then he said something to the sitter about them being ther [sic] 8 years, and I said, "Oh, so senority gives your son a free pass to be an abusive bully?":Anyway, I guess K&C are trying really hard to get rid of Nxxxxx, going so far as to invent problems. Since the babysitter isn't playing along, they have begun to punish HER! She's drawing the line right now. There will be a major overhaul in that place next week, and I am hoping that K&C finally have other arrangements made. If not, I am going to deck their dad, and I'm NOT kidding. I will do it. You watch. -Posted by loretta at March 4, 2005 10:07 AM

K & C are the nine-year old twins you said you could lick with one hand tied behind your back. You also stipulated you could take on the parents individually. You referred to those children as "Narcissts in Training" and authored an entry called, "Today's junior narcissist, tomorrow's murderer."

You may be a legend in your own mind, Loretta, but the general consensus is that you couldn't possibly stoop any lower than you did tonight! I hope your parents are proud of you. From where I'm sitting, you're a disgrace to the human race.

Keep your quarter - call Amnesty International!